<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Animated Graphs on Alex Cookson</title>
    <link>https://alexcookson.com/tags/animated-graphs/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Animated Graphs on Alex Cookson</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2020. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://alexcookson.com/tags/animated-graphs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Normalizing and rescaling children&#39;s book ratings (2 of 2)</title>
      <link>https://alexcookson.com/post/normalizing-childrens-book-ratings/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://alexcookson.com/post/normalizing-childrens-book-ratings/</guid>
      <description>Note: this is the second part of a two-post series where I “fix” some of the problems with crowd-sourced ratings, like those you find for movies or books. (In this series, I look at children’s books.) In the first part, I incorporated a Bayesian prior into the rating calculation to address books with very few ratings sometimes having extreme scores (like 5 out of 5 stars) that likely don’t reflect their actual quality.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>Rating children&#39;s books with empirical Bayes estimation (1 of 2)</title>
      <link>https://alexcookson.com/post/rating-childrens-books-with-empirical-bayes-estimation/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://alexcookson.com/post/rating-childrens-books-with-empirical-bayes-estimation/</guid>
      <description>Ratings sites – like Rotten Tomatoes and IMDb for movies or Goodreads for books – are annoying. They each seem to have their norms where the same rating means different things on different sites. A rating of 60% on one site might be good, but 6/10 (equivalent to 60%) on another site might be terrible. So you need to do some extra mental work to set your expectations based on the specific site you’re on.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>